Implementasi Metode Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Mobil Terbaik
Keywords:
Decision Support System, TOPSIS, Best Car Selection, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, RecommendationAbstract
Selecting the best car is a decision-making process that involves various criteria, such as price, fuel consumption, engine capacity, safety features, comfort, maintenance costs, and resale value. The large number of alternatives and the different characteristics of each vehicle often make it difficult for prospective buyers to determine the option that best suits their needs. Therefore, a Decision Support System (DSS) is needed that is able to provide objective recommendations based on a number of predetermined criteria. This study aims to implement the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method in a decision support system to determine the best car. The TOPSIS method was chosen because it has the ability to evaluate alternatives based on their proximity to the PIS and away from the NIS, thus producing a more accurate and rational alternative ranking. The research stages include identifying needs, determining criteria and weights, collecting alternative car data, the decision matrix normalization process, weighting, determining positive and negative ideal solutions, calculating the distance of each alternative to the ideal solution, and determining the preference value and final ranking. The implementation results show that the TOPSIS method is able to produce the best car recommendations systematically and objectively based on the highest preference value. The developed system can assist potential customers and dealers in making decisions more quickly, effectively, and efficiently. Therefore, implementing the TOPSIS method in a decision support system can be an effective solution for supporting the selection of the best car based on predetermined criteria.
References
Ali, M., & Makarim, M. (2020). Implementation of Weighted Product Method for Lecturer Performance Evaluation: A Case Study at XYZ University. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460101.2020.1717890
Halim, H., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). Enhancing Lecturer Performance Evaluation Using Weighted Product Method: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 623-638. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2020-0154
Nugroho, D., & Putra, R. (2022). Decision-Making Framework for Lecturer Assessment Using Weighted Product Method in Higher Education Institutions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09924-3
Pratama, M., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Optimization of Lecturer Performance Evaluation Using the Weighted Product Method: A Case Study at ABC University. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(3), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1924891
Rizal, M., & Santosa, B. (2023). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluating Lecturer Performance: Comparison between Weighted Product and Other Methods. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 16(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2023.115764
Sari, R., & Husin, M. (2022). A Comparative Study of Weighted Product and Analytical Hierarchy Process in Lecturer Performance Evaluation. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 20(3), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2022/v20i330600
Susanto, A., & Sari, W. (2021). Implementing Weighted Product Method for Performance Evaluation in Academic Institutions: Insights and Challenges. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(4), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15220366.2021.1888756
Yuliana, S., & Nugroho, E. (2023). Evaluating Lecturer Performance Using Weighted Product and Its Impact on Institutional Decision-Making. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10997-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christien Rozali, Dendi Sunardi, Afrizal Zein (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).




This work is licensed under a